The right are touting Social Security reform so our kids wont be saddled with debt. Let the facts put that tired old argument to rest. 

Paul N. Van de Water. is currently a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and he has 25 years of  top-level experience at the Social Security Administration and Congressional Budget Office. He wrote:

Here are the facts.  Social Security is a well-run, fiscally responsible program.  People earn retirement, survivors, and disability benefits by making payroll tax contributions during their working years.  Those taxes and other revenues are deposited in the Social Security trust funds, and all benefits and administrative expenses are paid out of the trust funds.  The amount that Social Security can spend is limited by its payroll tax income plus the balance in the trust funds.

The Social Security trustees — the official body charged with evaluating the program’s long-term finances — project that Social Security can pay 100 percent of promised benefits through 2037 and about three-quarters of scheduled benefits after that, even if Congress makes no changes in the program.  Relatively modest changes would put the program on a sound financial footing for 75 years and beyond.

Nonetheless, some critics are attempting to undermine confidence in Social Security with wild and blatantly false accusations.  They allege that the trust funds have been “raided” or disparage the trust funds as “funny money” or mere “IOUs.”  Some even label Social Security a “Ponzi scheme” after the notorious 1920s swindler Charles Ponzi.  All of these claims are nonsense. ...


Moreover, Social Security is the “polar opposite of a Ponzi scheme,” says the man who quite literally wrote the book about Ponzi’s famous scam, Boston University professor Mitchell Zuckoff.


Add comment

We collect your email address to reduce spam as we do not require user registration for you to make a comment. Your information is not being tracked nor will it appear publicly on our site. Please register and account and an email won't be required for each comment and you will be able to insert links and images in your comments. We also reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive or are blatant commercial posts.
Thank you for taking the time to comment.


Security code
Refresh

News and Comment - Questions and Commentary

Latest Comments

  • Phyllis Lesley
    I was approved for eb which would have been my final 20 weeks I am seeking as have been any employment. it is sad when you can't even get the minimum paying jobs ...

    Read more...

     
  • C CALHOUN
    I live in Texas and have just had my Tier IV benefits (13 weeks) "triggered off" as of May 12th. Everyone that I know is unemployed. I don't know where the state ...

    Read more...

     
  • Jessica
    There is also another company who has had their name stolen, Hostmonster INC, a legit web-hosting company has had their name stolen. They are the newest victims ...

    Read more...

     
  • cam
    Walker in WI can twist the numbers however he likes-but the reality is this...since walker's coming into office, over 30,000 WI jobs have been lost--and now ...

    Read more...

     
  • ernie s
    ..so i called Colorado unemployment and they said "Yes" for Federal Extended benefits...i will let you know..

    Read more...

Advertising disclaimer of sorts: NoJobSurvivor has received unsolicited anti-jobless, pro-corporation, right-wing propaganda advertisements in the rotating Google ad feed. Sorry for these offensive eyesores. We don't like them and wish they would never show up. Feel free to tell us the URL so we can block it. Thanks.course

Send an ECard

Tell your friends you have been laid-off, cheer up a unemployed colleague, send a card.

Description:
These times aren't easy and you've really been there for me. You rock!

See all the cards

Sites We Like

Check our Blogroll for sites we like.